Cover to Cover

...A glimpse into the books I read

3 Stars

...now browsing by category

 

‘Handbags and Homicide’

Saturday, July 24th, 2010

0758243227_0758243227By: Dorothy Howell
Year: 2008
Genre: Mystery

Find this book at Amazon.com

Haley Randolph is in debt. She is addicted to designer handbags and has no impulse control. When she sees a bag, she must buy that bag (and we’re not talking $200 Coach bags). Because of her addiction, Haley has had to take a second job working at a local department store chain. She hates her job. She hates the people she works for and… what?!? Someone is killed on her shift and Haley finds the body as she slacking off in the back room. On top of that, Haley is on leave (read: fired) from her day job at a law firm. All-in-all, Haley’s life is a mess. Add to these two mysteries a handsome man who turns out to be very rich and powerful, a mother who is very rich and trying out a new career-of-the-month and a friend who may not be what he seems to be (plus Haley’s own unbelievable narcissism and debilitating debt) and we have a pretty standard murder-mystery.

Haley stumbles through this novel. She doesn’t really care about anything but how to buy her next handbag, though there are glimmers through the novel that Haley does care about some people in her lives and is interested in their well-being… well, as it has to do with fashion. I was really surprised that she was even able to solve not just one, but two mysteries. She just doesn’t seem that observant. Haley is considered a suspect in both mysteries and knows that things will get better if only she can clear her name. I’d like to write more about the plot, dissect it like I try to do… but really, this is a very fluffy book. It’s an easy read. There isn’t an investment in the characters or their plight. I personally didn’t care too much for Haley and have no idea why the love interest in this book is interested in her (come on, you had to know there was going to be a love interest. I bet you also know that he and Haley don’t get along for most of the book and their relationship “grows” despite stupid miscommunication).

“Handbags and Homicide” is a good summer book. It’s cute, it’s distracting, it’s easy to read. Yes, the main character is whiney and selfish but I gotta admit, she thinks the things we probably all do at times (maybe even more than we’d like to admit). Generally I’m not a huge fan of “chick lit” because I think so often it’s insulting to women (apparently we’re stupid and just looking for love in that perfect way that doesn’t happen in real life) and men (they’re just there for looks). I’ve tried a couple of chick lit books this summer and had to return them after just a couple chapters. This isn’t much better, but it has no deeper meanings. There is no pretending Haley is deeper than she is. She is exactly as shallow as she appears. For a chick lit novel, that’s refreshing.

My rating: 3 out of 5 stars

‘The Forest of Hands and Teeth’

Saturday, July 10th, 2010

The_Forest_of_Hands_and_Teeth_pb_coverBy: Carrie Ryan
Year: 2009
Genre: Teen

Find this book on Amazon.com

It’s pretty clear early on what this novel is: a post-apocalyptic zombie book aimed at teens. Mary is living in a small village surrounded by tall, chain-link fences. And zombies. Well, “Unconsecrated” as they’re called in this book. Once a year they have marriage ceremonies for those few young people who get married. Mary’s “true love” is marrying another and no one seems interested in her. Right away, Mary’s mother is bitten by a zombie and sent into the “Forest of Hands and Teeth” (you know, because aside from trees, there are biting and scratching zombies). She is sent there because Mary can’t stand to have her mother killed. This action causes Mary’s brother to disown her, making her homeless so she must go live with the “Sisters” who run the village. Much goes on quickly: Mary sees a woman arrive from the forest who is not a zombie. Mary talks to this woman, Gabrielle, through paper-thin walls and learns she is from another village and that the ocean (which Mary has only heard of through her mother’s stories) is real. Eventually, we see that Gabrielle was somehow turned into a zombie. The reason why and the explanation of how are never addressed though we’re lead to believe it was the Sisterhood for some reason. Gabrielle is a lightening-fast and extra-vicious zombie and eventually breaks through the fence. Without giving too much away, Mary and her companions escape through a system of gates which keeps them safe from the Unconsecrated. The book is the story of her experiences.

It is here that I have to admit something: I didn’t like Mary. She is self-absorbed and selfish. Her quest to find the ocean directly leads to the death and injury of friends and family. Mary keeps to herself important information. This obsessive secret-keeping leads to many of the problems in her life. She is passionately in love with a boy from afar. While we are led to believe they were friends as children (it is a very small village), Mary doesn’t appear to know anything about him. She is in love with an ideal and a LOT of pain comes from that idealized love. It is written from Mary’s point of view. Since she is a loner, there are not many conversations to fill the book. It really is everything as Mary sees it.

This book is labeled “teen” but that seems to be a distinction only by the publisher. There really isn’t an indication of Mary’s age. I assumed she was in her late teens while a friend thought she was 16. Neither of us have any real foundation for those ages. This book is easy to read though some parts are pretty graphic. I guess that makes it a teen novel.

This is the first book in a series, but I have no desire to read the rest of the books. While the story was interesting enough for me to want to finish it, I don’t care what happens to the characters or Mary’s family (there was an excerpt of the next book in the copy I had. It is told from the point-of-view of Mary’s daughter, so she must have found some happiness). This is not a new story nor is is the best re-telling of an old, “heard it before” story. There is no depth to any of the characters, there is no growth, there is no learning or evolution. The way Mary is at the beginning of the book is the way Mary is in the middle of the book is the way Mary is at the end of the book.

I may be alone in my review of this book (though not really because of the reviews on Amazon, 13 people only gave it one star). If you check out the link above to Amazon, there is an “Amazon Exclusive” review of the book plus an interview with the author. Reviewer Scott Westerfeld obviously loved this book and found much more depth than I did. According to the review, this novel tells of the teen plight against authority and traditional roles that stifle American youth of today. I have to say, reading Westerfeld’s review made me want to love this book. I would have loved the book he described. Instead I think author Ryan gives us an old story in an old format with an unlikable character. She also made backhanded stabs at organized religion that I find insulting and all-too-common in today’s society.

This wasn’t a terrible book. It was interesting and written well enough. I just didn’t like Mary and I didn’t care what happened to her. I’ve read better teen books and much better zombie books.

My rating: 3 out of 5 stars (because really, I’ve read worse)

‘Dead Man’s Folly’

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

Dead_Folly_jpg_235x600_q95By: Agatha Christie
Year: 1956
Genre: Mystery

Find this book at Amazon.com

I’ve always been an Agatha Christie fan. For years I’ve read her books, but I’ve always avoided Hercule Poirot books. I started to read one years ago and found him pompous and irritating. Perhaps I’ve softened because he wasn’t that bad in this book.

In “Dead Man’s Folly,” we find Poirot late in his career. He is requested to join a party at an estate. A mystery authoress is planning a special murder mystery event during the gala, but using that special sense that mystery authors seem to possess, she is sure a real murder is being planned and she is being manipulated. Once Poirot arrives, mystery ensues. and the enevitable murder. As with any good Christie novel, there are a dozen people staying at the manor and any of them could have motive and everyone had means. The twisty story is told from the point of view of Poirot and that of the inspector on the case. While both come across as quite capable, neither seems to be able to get over the hump that connects everything, though finally—with a result that is out of left field—they do.

This is not one of Christie’s best novels. I’m currently reading another Poirot story and it is sharper and not quite so convoluted so far. “Dead Man’s Folly” has a cast of a dozen characters and non of them are likable. The writing was crisp. The English country side beautiful, I’m sure. The people were upper-class and lived as such. But it just didn’t make sense. While the authoress had an idea she was being manipulated, it wasn’t explained what lead her to that conclusion or even why the manipulation was necessary (or how it was done). When Poirot does the big reveal at the end, he doesn’t explain why everything happened the way it did or what exactly led him to his resolution (really, it was just a handful of passing conversations and Poirot should have figured out earlier because he had those conversations weeks before he solves the case).

This book gets me ready to read other Christie novels of  because she why she is much more of an amazing author than this book lets on. The anthology which  I found “Dead Man’s Folly” contains five novels in total. The first was good, classic Christie (”Murder at the Vicarage)  and the next one is setting out to be very interesting (well written so far).

Read other Agatha Christie novels before you read this (Have you ever read, “The Murder of Roger Ackroyd”? I read it in college and WOW! You will NEVER see the end coming!). Then use this just as filler. Or not at all. She has so many better novels.

My rating: 3 out of 5 stars (because it’s still Agatha Christie and it was still better than some of the junk I’ve read!)

‘Going Bovine’

Saturday, March 13th, 2010

By: Libba Bray
Year: 2009
Genre: Teen

Find this book at Amazon.com

Cameron is a 16-year-old slacker. His family—including a twin sister— is screwed up and don’t know Cameron spends a lot of his time high. Then he starts to have seizures and hallucinate. At first, he is sent to a variety of therapists, then a drug counselor until they finally realize Cameron’s problems are physical. He has Creutzfeldt-Jacob, better known as “mad cow disease.” And it’s uncurable. ”Going Bovine” follows Cameron as he goes on a journey to find a cure to the disease. A cure promised by an angel with pink wings and a wrist band for Cameron from Disneyworld which counts down the time he has to find a cure to the disease. His travels include alternate dimensions, snow globes, a Norse god trapped in the body of a yard gnome and a youth cult.

It’s pretty obvious early on what is really going on in the story, but I won’t give it away. The buzz on this book led me to have high expectations. I was disappointed. The writing is fine but it’s not great (and I found an editing inconsistency which just drives me crazy!). The story has it’s moments, but in general it’s too long and often times silly (not in a good way). Bray just drags the story on when she should be ending it and throws in crazy things that don’t make sense.

In this novel, Bray, who is an obvious woman, writes first-person as a 16-year-old boy. I normally don’t mind when an author of one gender writes as the opposite gender (I think Neil Gaiman did a wonderful job writing as a girl in “Coraline“). For some reason—and I can’t put my finger on what it was specifically—it really bothered me in this book. Maybe I felt like Bray wasn’t authentic writing as a teen-aged boy. Maybe I just disliked the book and was trying to find something to justify my dislike. But it just seemed…off. And ending? Yeah, I just said, “Huh” out loud and closed the book.

It wasn’t the worst book I’ve ever read. It wasn’t the worse written book I’ve ever read. But I just don’t believe it was worth the hype heaped on it.

My rating: 3 out of 5 stars

‘Finger Lickin’ Fifteen’

Friday, January 15th, 2010

By: Janet Evanovich
Year: 2009
Genre: Mystery
Find this book at Amazon.com

Let’s see if I can summarize this book for you: Bounty hunter Stephanie Plum has bounties to catch. She does this with the “help” from her ex-hooker friend Lula. But they make a big mess of it, bounties don’t get caught and a car is started on fire (or explodes). Something “BIG” happens that is the primary mystery of the book which involves cop Morelli and bounty hunter/security specialist Ranger (both sexy hunks Stephanie wants to and has slept with). Meanwhile, Stephanie’s grandmother pulls a gun, Stephanie and her grandmother cause a scene at the funeral home, Stephanie’s dad just wants dinner, Stephanie has to live at Ranger’s house (but no sex!), her nemesis makes an leather-bustier appearance and Stephanie somehow saves the day.

Now, the mystery is, which of author Janet Evanovich’s 15 Stephanie Plum novels am I describing? Psych! So far I’m describing the last several books. Is “Finger Lickin’ Fifteen” the same as most of the books in the series? Pretty much. Is it a fun, easy read? Pretty much.

Evanovich is an easy writer to read. Everything is just a little silly. The problem is, Evanovich has become extraordinarily predictable. The last several Stephanie Plum novels are truly like a Mad Libs. Basic situations and events in each story are always the same. Certain things always have to happen. At first it was fun to see these things happen to Stephanie every time (Goodness gracious? Another car destroyed? Oh my goodness, what did Grandma do in the funeral home now?). Now, these events are just predictable and are quickly crossing into ridiculous.

Here are my biggest complaints:

  • After 15 books—which even in book time have to span several years—Stephanie should have some basic understanding on what she needs to do to collect her bounties. She makes stupid mistakes (to add comic relief which is becoming tedious and predictaable) on what should be an easy catch. By now, why hasn’t she learned some fighting and capture techniques?
  • After 15 books, Stephanie should realize Lula is self-centered, greedy and disrespectful. She ruins every capture and doesn’t help Stephanie in any tangible way. Their relationship is a weird, co-dependent mess. And why doesn’t she have any other friends?
  • After 15 books, I am tired of the “Should she go with safe Morelli or sexy Ranger” waffling. She must be phenomenal in some as-yet-unmentioned ways for these men to be hanging on for so long and allowing her to jump from bed to bed with no real consequences.
  • After 15 books, can we PLEASE shake up the formula? No one important ever dies or suffers a true loss. There is nothing riding on Stephanie’s choices (which, by the way, she never has to deal with any consequences of her bad actions). In fact, Stephanie’s moral dilemmas are silly and she never has to live with the guilt or anger from making a tough choice. Even her hamster has lived for much longer than a real hamster would. I’m not saying to get rid of the light, breezy silliness and turn these books into dark, dire reality. I’ve read authors who deal with tragedy in a lighter manner as a coping mechanism. Stay light, but have some deeper issues to give the books some substance.

So, why did I add my name to the waiting list? Because despite my irritations, these are quick and silly books to read. In the midst of  heavy worries in life and deep theological readings for school, it’s fun to just read a book that is quick, easy and doesn’t require me to focus too much. Evanovich is a consistent writer. You can pick up any one of the 15 books and be hooked into the novel. Back story isn’t really a concern because each book is essentially the same book. It doesn’t matter if you know that Stephanie lived with Morelli or not, because the specifics of their history don’t bring about uncomfortable consequences.

I will continue to read Evanovich’s novels. I will probably continue to be a little disappointed if they remain the same, but not enough to stop reading them. They’re good, pretty clean, silly fun.

My rating: 3 out of 5 stars

‘Heat Wave’

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

By: Richard Castle
Year: 2009
Genre: Mystery

Amazon.com summary:

A New York real estate tycoon plunges to his death on a Manhattan sidewalk. A trophy wife with a past survives a narrow escape from a brazen attack. Mobsters and moguls with no shortage of reasons to kill trot out their alibis. And then, in the suffocating grip of a record heat wave, comes another shocking murder and a sharp turn in a tense journey into the dirty little secrets of the wealthy. Secrets that prove to be fatal. Secrets that lay hidden in the dark until one NYPD detective shines a light.

Mystery sensation Richard Castle, blockbuster author of the wildly best-selling Derrick Storm novels, introduces his newest character, NYPD Homicide Detective Nikki Heat. Tough, sexy, professional, Nikki Heat carries a passion for justice as she leads one of New York City’s top homicide squads. She’s hit with an unexpected challenge when the commissioner assigns superstar magazine journalist Jameson Rook to ride along with her to research an article on New York’s Finest. PulitzerPrize-winning Rook is as much a handful as he is handsome. His wise-cracking and meddling aren’t her only problems. As she works to unravel the secrets of the murdered real estate tycoon, she must also confront the spark between them. The one called heat.

“Hmmm,” you say. “That author’s name is familiar, but I haven’t see it on the New York Times Bestseller List,” you say. Okay, well, um, I’ll be upfront. See, Richard Castle isn’t a real person. Richard Castle is a character on a TV show. You see, what happened here is that my worlds have made a complete circle and I’m pretty sure reality is in the process of collapsing.

“Castle,” a TV show that I love, is centered around a writer writing a book and following a New York City cop as research. Much bantering and hilarity ensues. In season two, the book is published and this is the book, which was really written in the “real world” and published and losers like me check it out from the library. Oddly enough, the book is “written” by a writer following a cop who wrote about a writer following a cop to write a magazine article. See, the snake is eating it’s own tail!

The book is good. It’s a generic New York cop detective novel. The kind you read during a cold weekend and finish up pretty quickly. It’s very formulaic. It doesn’t deal with anything ground-breaking or earth-shattering. The author had a checklist of what was supposed to be in a mystery novel (tough woman—check, jaunty smart-assed man—check, murdering who-dunnit—check, little nookie—check) and made sure to get each item in. But it’s fun. And if you like the TV show “Castle” it’s a lot of fun. The author’s bio is that of fictional character Richard Castle with actor Nathan Fillion’s picture (in the interest of full disclosure: I have had a crush on Fillion since finding “Firefly“). The acknowledgements are written in the voice of Rick Castle and mention the characters on the TV show (until the very end when the real author—who is never named—mentions the actors’ real names and gives his or her own thanks briefly).

In “Heat Wave” we meet Nikki Heat, a rough-around-the-edges-but-with-a-heart-of-gold homicide detective. She is being trailed by magazine writer Jameson Rook (get it, Castle… Rook, get it?). There is a strong attraction between the two as well the anticipated antagonism. They are investigating the suicide—or is it a homicide?—of a real estate “tycoon.” Soon the two of them find out the case is much more while dealing with an August heat wave in New York city. Cliché? Absolutely. Fun? Definitely.

I do have one complaint about the book which truly makes me look like the loser I am. Okay, so this is supposed to be written following Detective Beckett on “Castle” right? Well, book character Nikki Heat has issues with witnessing her mother’s murder. If you watch the show at all, you’d know Castle got into big trouble for looking in the murder of Beckett’s mother and promised to drop it. Wouldn’t Beckett be furious to read this book (which watchers know she did) and see that part added in? I would think so. Of course, it’s a fictional writer writing a fictional book based on a fictional TV show character, so maybe I should just let it be…

Despite my obvious television-neurosis, I suggest reading this book if you like the mystery genre (it’s even better if you imagine it read in the voice of Fillion). This book is othing new, but loads of fun.

My rating: 3 out of 5 stars

‘Erased’

Monday, December 14th, 2009

By: Jim Krusoe
Year: 2009
Genre: Fiction

Amazon.com summary:

When Theodore receives a postcard saying “I need to see you,” he initially ignores it—after all, it’s unsettling to open mail from one’s dead mother. But when another card arrives he can no longer put off the urgent meeting, and so Theodore treks to Cleveland to track his mother down. In this strange, thoughtful novel by Jim Krusoe, Theodore travels through the worlds of Uleene, a member of the all-girl biker club Satan’s Samaritans; art; rodent extermination; and sport fishing, all the while realizing that the line between life and death is remarkably fluid.

I love the quirky writer. I love the witty writer. I love the self-assured writer. I hate it when they think they are too quirky, witty and self-assured for their own good. Sadly, this book turned out to be written by such an author.

It started out quirky enough. The protaganist, Theodore, seems to be lucky in life despite being as naive as an adult can possibly be. He grew up with a woman named Linda who used to sell medicinal “rare kelp” (obviously pot) and he sells high-end garden tools that have started to be used for high-profile murders across the country. In the midst of this, his mother disappears and he eventually receives notice that she has died. And then he gets a postcard from her. Theodore decides to go on a trip to Cleveland to find out what is going on.

At first, this was a refreshing book. The naivety of Theodore and his love of Cleveland as the most perfect city in the country was enjoyable to read. It was fun the first couple times Theodore and Uleene visited weird women’s clubs around town. It was refreshing as he enjoyed his new-found love of sculpture. But the same thing kept happening each time he visited a women’s club…over and over. His naivety became irritating and I started to wonder how he was even able to wash his face without drowning. By the end, I didn’t much care  how the book ended, which turned out to be some kind of esoteric, post-modern comment on life and death. And apparently we’re supposed to be smart enough to figure out what the loose ends Krusoe never ties up mean. I guess I’m just not smart enough.

Despite my high hopes, I have to give this a low rating. And for the first time, I’m giving a half star. This book wasn’t good enough for a three star, but not bad enough for a two star. And because I don’t want to keep adding star categories, the category rating for this movie is higher than my actual rating, so it looks better than it was.

My rating: 2.5 out of 3 stars

‘The Firstborn’

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

By: Conlan Brown
Year: 2009
Genre: Fiction

Amazon.com summary:

The Firstborn, those gifted with Foresight, Hindsight, and Insight at the time of Christ s death are divided between themselves. And when an Islamic holy man is murdered outside of his mosque it becomes apparent that one of the Firstborn was to blame. Now, with the threat of a terrorist attack on an unspeakable target the Firstborn are spiraling out of control. Leaders are dying, members are being kidnapped, and unity is being forced. Three heroes, differently gifted and divided must work together to thwart those who would go too far.

Their breakneck race against time plunges them into a world of danger and through a gauntlet across the United States. From the River-walk of San Antonio, where Devin Bathurst, John Temple, and Hannah Rice must protect one another from assassination, to the gritty streets of Washington DC, a paramilitary compound in West Virginia, and ultimately back to our nation’s Capital, the Firstborn must unite to prevent an impending atrocity from becoming reality.

I love religious fiction. Either blatant (found in the religious section) or not-so-blatant (found in the fiction section). It’s not always great (usually it’s not) and since being in seminary, I’ve found that it’s not always theologically sound (but more enjoyable because I know it’s not). How could I resist a religious thriller in the new-release section? I couldn’t, that’s how. And all-in-all, it’s not bad, it’s just nothing special.

The story starts with Hannah’s kidnapping. Never find out why she was kidnapped or by whom (though maybe we did and I just forgot or missed it). It’s merely a chance to have Hannah meet Devin. See, they each come from a different family (I still don’t have the names straight, so we will call them… nothing because it doesn’t matter for my review) and the different families have been raised to hate each other, but Devin saves Hannah and so a bridge has been started. And that bridge matters because they are thrown together in a very dramatic manner—along with a missionary from the third family—and must save the entire Western world. If they can’t save America, NO one can.

Hmmm. Did that sound a little snarky? Oh, sorry. But so many authors think their main characters have to save the country or the world to make the story compelling…It’s getting kind of silly. This story turned into an “us-versus-them” story. We have to stop the terrorists before they bomb a school which somehow will start a world war or make a point or something. And the guy who has the gift of “insight” reads into the minds of the terrorists. While the author tries to give them some humanity to make the reader feel sorry for the terrorist, it’s really just a tool to make the Firstborn real heroes (though I kept asking myself why they didn’t just call the cops. There was a lot of “my gun is bigger than your gun” when a call to the police/FBI/CIA or even the PTA would have solved the problem pretty simply. There is a big firefight at the end that could have been stopped with one phone call).

Don’t expect deep reading, though the author thinks he is much smarter than we are (The author bio states that Brown enjoys “developing high-octane, thought-provoking fiction that turns pages and excites the senses”. Yeah, not so much). This was a fun read, but I didn’t feel great ideas forming in my head or the desire to bring about world peace. Need something to pass the time while you’re sitting at home avoiding the malls on Black Friday? This would be a good way to pass the time.

My rating: 3 out of 5 stars

‘Bones’

Saturday, November 14th, 2009

By: Jonathan Kellerman
Year: 2008
Genre: Mystery

Amazon.com summary:

Two intriguing preliminary chapters suck readers right in to Kellerman’s latest Alex Delaware thriller, even though Delaware is disappointingly less active than usual in the story—doing hardly more than relating the circumstances surrounding the crime that he and his cop buddy, Lieutenant Milo Sturgis, are determined to solve. The mutilated corpse of a young music teacher, who turns out to be less than prim and proper, is dumped in a protected wetland. Nearby, buried in the marsh, are several more bodies, all of prostitutes whose right hands have been hacked off. Clues lead Sturgis and Delaware to the palatial digs of the music teacher’s young student, who is nowhere to be found. The only one home is the family’s gofer, who apparently has a juvenile record. Sturgis’ antennae really start twitching, though, when the young man disappears. Surely that’s the act of a guilty man. If the whole isn’t quite as suspenseful as initial chapters promise, Kellerman’s intriguing, often oddball characters (including a rookie detective) deliver the goods in this briskly paced procedural. Not among the long-running series’ best entries, but fans will be sufficiently entertained. —Stephanie Zvirin

Slippers, a special blanket, that sweatshirt that you won’t wear out of the house but won’t throw away. That’s what Kellerman’s books are like for me. They are comfortable and familiar. I’ve been reading his novels for years and I’m pretty sure I’ve read every Alex Delaware novel. The characters are known, the mysteries interesting, the writing good enough. These are quick reads and the stories move along nicely. This is no exception.

Kellerman doesn’t break any new ground with his books. This is a typical cop mystery. It has been interesting through the books to see how Alex Delaware has gone from a young, eager psychologist with a thriving practice who is always ready to stick his neck out to an older, cynical and somewhat pretentious psychologist who seems to do work—but never activley—who is more interested in agitating the assumed criminal instead of presuming innocence despite some 30-odd previous adventures which have shown it’s never the first, second or third finger point, well, unless it is.

While this was a good book, it’s not a great book. There was nothing earth-shattering about it. The main characters seemed to phone in their performances—there were no emotional highs or lows for the main character and there was a secondary “love” story added almost as an afterthought (Kellerman introduced two new characters in this book who have ended up in a book of their own. I’m sure the “love” story was a set up for that book). I didn’t feel the tension that I have felt reading some of the older stories. Maybe it’s time to shake things up or for Alex to retire. Kellerman has written other non-Delaware stories, maybe it’s time to focus on those.

That said, this was a perfectly fine book to read. I enjoyed it. I read it quickly. The plot was interesting if a little “out there.” It was familiar and comfortable. Probably not words an author wants to hear about their books, but not always a bad thing, either. I recommend this book if you’re looking for a good, standard mystery that’s quick to read. If you’re looking for something great, read one of Kellerman’s earlier works instead.

My rating: 3 out of 5 stars

‘The Soldiers of Halla’

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

By: D.J. MacHale
Year: 2009
Genre: Teen

Amazon.com summary:

It has all been leading to this. Every victory. Every loss. All the thrills and sadness; the hope and despair. Bobby Pendragon’s heart-pounding journey through time and space has brought him to this epic moment. He and his fellow Travelers must join forces for one last desperate battle against Saint Dane. At stake is not only the tenth and final territory, but all that ever was or will be. Everywhere. This is the war for Halla. Every question is answered. Every truth is revealed. The final battle has begun.

Sounds dramatic, doesn’t it. But for those of us who have read the first nine books, this is dramatic. Bobby Pendragon and the other teens in his life aren’t just saving their town, their country or even their world. They are tasked with saving all of creation. Bobby is a “Traveller” and each world has its own Traveller to watch and protect the world. Bobby and these other Travellers must stop a malevolent being known as Saint Dane from destroying these “territories” and creating his own world to rule over. Each of the previous books dealt with the war on each world. “War” isn’t quite right, because really it was Bobby and his friends having to stop a “turning point” in each civilization which basically showed if the people picked the good or the bad of their destiny.

I’ve always loved these books and couldn’t wait for the final book. How was it going to end? What was the answer to questions that Bobby has been asking all along (no, I’m not going to tell you what questions…you have to read the books yourself). I wasn’t disappointed in the sense that all of the questions were answered. I was disappointed in the last minute game-changer MacHale added (I won’t tell you what it is, but will say: Solera).

MacHale indeed wraps up the saga. He does so in a pretty satisfying way, at least answering all of the questions he has asked in the first nine books in a mostly acceptable manner (unlike other long series from some  authors I have read **cough cough** Stephen King’s The Dark Tower **cough cough**). I will admit that some of MacHale’s answers had me scratching my head and going, “huh?” But he did wrap the story up and at least give an ending to all of the characters.

One problem I’ve always had with MacHale’s book has been his lengthy exposition. This is doubly so in “The Solders of Halla.” Bobby just blabbers on and on describing what he’s feeling and what’s going on around him. I’ve always preferred strong dialogue or a compelling narrative in my novels. I usually skim over long, descriptive paragraphs (what the room looks like, what color the walls are, how everyone is dressed) and that seems to be the way MacHale writes. In previous books that is broken up by stories of other characters from their points of view. I often found these additional stories were more compelling. This book is totally in Bobby’s narration and becomes bogged down in his own exposition. It took me longer to read than expected.

I would recommend this series as a whole much more than I would recommend this one book. And don’t read this one book without reading all of the others. MacHale doesn’t recap the previous books and things won’t make sense if you read this first. But do read the series, especially if you have a teen reader in your house.

My rating: 3 out of 5 stars

(But 4 out of 5 stars for the entire series)